From: Christopher Gwinn
Message: 11553
Date: 2001-11-27
> Is there anybody interested in considering the existence of an IE,Sure.
> non-Celtic stratum in ancient Britannia?
> Starting from the fact that Celtic was a /o/ language, a simplecriterion
> to separate Celtic and non-Celtic toponyms could be looking forones that
> have an /a/ where /o/ would be expected from Ablaut of a PIE root.What evidence is there that Celtic was an "/o/" dialect? can you give
> I found:We should note here that -aua may actually be a Manuscript corruption
> 1) Aballava (Rav.), if this comes from *abel- 'apple'.
> while 2) Alauna, Alaunus fl. (many, Ptol., Rav., Ant.) can beAlauna comes ultimately from an earlier *Alamna, where the root *al-
> interpreted as well as 'streaming water', from the root *el-/ol-
>(in an /a/ language > *al-) and the *aw- coming from the previous
> one, in an /a/, thus non-Celtic language.
> The same *al- is found inCeltic briga "hill" is the zero-grade form of *bhergh- "high" - a
> 3) Alobergium (Rav.). Here, -bergium can be related to *bherg^h-,
> but since Celtic has already briga 'hill' coming from this root, it
> has to be the briga-equivalent in another language different from
> Celtic.
> 4) Ardaunium (Rav.). Again, a second component *aw-, with a firstI will need to check on this one. I do not believe that we have an
> component that resembles Skr. ardati 'to flow', Lith. place-name
> Ardija, but tells nothing about /a/ or /o/ feature, because of Gk.
> ardo 'to bedew'
> 5) Brunavis (Rav.). Here, the same *aw- as a second component,I think this might be a corrupt form.
> while the first, if it can be related to *bhru:- 'bridge', cannot
> be Celtic that already has briva. Otherwise, if it is from a root
> (Pokorny) *bhreu-(n-) 'spring', cfr. germ. Brunnen, it tells us
> nothing about /a/ or /o/ feature.
> 6) Aesica (Rav.). As many other toponyms in ancient Europe, hereIt could also come from an original *ai-s- or *ais-, but an a-grade
> the root should be *eis- and Ablaut-variants, 'rapid' (often said
> of water). The version with /a/ couldn't therefore belong to an /o/
> language. Apparently related to the Ablaut-variant *is- are Isca(s)
> fl. (Ptol., Rav.) and Isurium (Ptol., Ant., Rav.)
> 7) Sabrina fl. (Ptol.), Sarna (Rav.). Here I see a descendant (inI will have to check on this, but offhand I think that Sabrina might
> an /a/ language) of *seu-/sou-/su- 'a juice' > *saw- > *saw-rn-a >
> Sàbrina, Sarna > Severn. Compare Savo fl. (Ita), Sava/Saus fl.
>(Pan), Savia (Tar), Ohg. sou 'juice', Skr. sava 'id.' But probably
> on this rather large river a lot of material has been already
> written. Somebody can help me here ?
> 8) Tamarus fl. (Ptol., Rav.) If from *tem- 'to cut', it should beI am fairly certain that a Celtic etymology has been proposed for the
> the /o/ Ablaut-variant in an /a/ language. But again we have here
> also Tamesa fl. (the Thames) and probably something more authored
> has been said on it. Who helps me ?