From: george knysh
Message: 11527
Date: 2001-11-26
> Pseudo-Zachariah lists the Dirmar together with*****GK: My source for the list was M.I. Artamonov,
> thirteen other "peoples", some of whom are
> well-known Turkic or North Caucasian ethnoi. As far
> as I can see, among the peoples on the list only the
> Alans are unquestionably Iranian-speaking.
> source does not say or imply that the Dirmar were*****GK: Sources rarely give that kind of information.
> "the main Iranic tribal group of the Don to Volga
> steppe"; linguistically, they may well have been
> Turkic.
>that
> (PG)What makes me wary of your interpretation is
> whereas Dirmar is a hapax legomenon and we know****GK: It's good to be skeptical. Speaking of Askold
> nothing of substance about the name or the people so
> called, Askold and Dir are perfectly plausible Norse
> personal names (e.g. Askaldr [or H�skuldr?], D�ri,
> cf. OE De:or). Whatever its historical referents,
> the _name_ Dir is more likely of Scandinavian origin
> than related to <Dirmar>.
>__________________________________________________
> Piotr
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: george knysh
> To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:41 AM
> Subject: Re: [tied] Scythian tribal names
>
>
> *****GK: As far as I know they are only mentioned in
> two contexts, one certain, the other speculative.
> The certain context is a mid-6th c. list of
> Don-Volga steppe peoples found in a Syrian source
> (pseudo-Zacharias). The speculative context I
> developed a few years ago through microanalysis of
> the Nestor Chronicle. I concluded that a case could
> be made that the constant pairing of the two rulers
> of Kyiv (Kiev) mentioned there as "boyars of Rurik",
> to wit, Askold and Dyr (Askold i Dir -->
> Askolt-i-Dir(t), killed by Oleg on the Ugrian Hill,
> might represent not so much an earlier Norse
> presence, as a Khazar imperial one. That's actually
> the background of my queries about Turkic and/or
> Iranic "i". I'm reasonably certain about the
> historical and archaeological evidence, less so
> about the linguistic one. "Askol" was a Turkic title
> meaning "ruler of the (western) borderland", which
> seemed rather appropriate in the case of mid-9th
> century Kyiv. The Nestor Chronicle
> locates "Dir's tomb" in an area of the old city
> where archaeological excavations have discovered
> burials according to the Zoroastrian rite of West
> Khazaria I mentioned in a separate post. My
> assumption was that some of the Dir (or Dirmar) had
> been sent to the Kyivan outpost by the Kagan-Bek of
> Itil. I published an article containing this
> suggestion in The Ukrainian Quarterly (NY) 2000,
> entitled "The mystery of Kyiv's
> original Rus'". I didn't develop any theories about
> the later fate of the Dirmar. Their Donetz
> settlements were destroyed by the Pechenegs, and
> their remnants incorporated into the P. and
> successor Hordes. I suppose they were eventually
> Turkicized.*****
>