From: Glen Gordon
Message: 11460
Date: 2001-11-23
>>We can reconstruct, after the "svarita lengthening rule":Arrgh. Why on earth would there be a rule against two consecutive
>>
>>NA **w�:da:n **wad�:n
>
>An afterthought:
>
>The form on the left is problematic,[...] Perhaps there was a rule >against
>two consecutive long vowels, so that **w�:da:n becomes
>**w�:dan > *w�dr.
>That would also explain a form like coll. *dk^�mt(h2), not
>**dk^�mot(h2) (< **dak^�:ma(:)t).