From: markodegard@...
Message: 10932
Date: 2001-11-03
> The irregularity of *pxte:r and *maxte:r was not created out of
> nothing. It was created by analogy. These words are not isolates.
> They are part of a larger system of kinship terminology. I'm
> stating that *pxte:r, being derived from *pax- "feed, nourish"
> and *-te:r [actor suffix], had been created in Late IE, long
> after the loss of final vowels in Mid IE. The suffix *-te:r
> itself has a long and tortured prehistory.
>
> Now, since *pxte:r, *maxte:r, *bhraxte:r and *dhugxte:r all appear
> to have the same *-xte:r suffix, it begs to reason that there has
> been assimilatory processes at work here. Since we know
> where *pxte:r REALLY comes from, it would appear that THIS word
> is the source of the spread of an otherwise nonsensical and
> unused suffix *-xte:r.
>
> Here's how. As *pxte:r replaced whatever word came before it
> for "father", it was apparently misanalysed as being a combination
> of a nursery term for father, perhaps **(a)pa-, plus some strange
> ending *-xte:r. Hence, by simple analogy...
>
> MidIE Late IE
> *ame **(a)ma- + *xte:r => *maxte:r
> *beraxWe **bhrax- + *xte:r => *bhraxte:r
> *deuk:e **dhug- + *xte:r => *dhugxte:r
>