Re: [tied] IE numbers

On Wed, 17 Oct 2001 23:50:28, "Glen Gordon" <glengordon01@...>
wrote:

>First, define your meaning of "fortis".

It sure isn't "voiceless aspirate". Look it up.

>> >Note also Latin /unificare/.
>>
>>Why? 1. it's not Classical Latin, 2. it doesn't mean "bad".
>
>2. So what? A verb literally meaning "to be one" might convey
> a million and one nuances. Here, I'm implying that the nuance
> came to be "to be alone" and then "to be abandoned".

In which language? Not in Latin.