From: celteuskara@...
Message: 9090
Date: 2001-09-06
>Vae victis yourself. Where are those chronologically impossibleYou really are saying that Wodenaz or whatever we're to be calling him at this stage really represents some real feller who lead such easily reconstructable folk movements that were really so swift in succession?? I had thought Snorri and Saxo were repeating some sort of vague memory, but if you'l forgive me I'm a little sceptical as to your theory. I am intrigued though.
>places that Odin (as opposed to Odin) pops up?
>
>BTW Benveniste doesn't mention German <weihen> consecrate etc inNice idea, but what do you mean by this 'luck' thingy?
>his discussion of Lat. <vinco>, <victima> etc. To turn Benvenistish:
>doesn't the Germanic idea of consecrating the enemy by throwing a
>spear at his army mean that from now on, they're dead men walking?
>(Funny how can find these proto-things well preserved in the USA,
>wile they're dead in the old land, luck is another example.)
>Which reminds me: Brennus' vae victis is sufficiently simple anIf only!
>utterance and Italic and Celtic then sufficiently close that he may
>have uttered it in Celtic and yet be understood. Did he really
>mean: Forget this. Kill <vae> the victims (as <fas> is)?
>
>Vae victis.Be passionate about your email