From: Christopher Gwinn
Message: 6780
Date: 2001-03-26
> I wonder how good the formal match between <Arioma[:]nus> and <Eremon>Well. all that I can offer is that in the Dictionary of the Irish Language,
> really is. I gather that the relation is not unprecedented though not
> quite regular either.
> There are some questions that must be addressed if one wants toPIE *-men endings regularly develop into Celtic -man. Note the Gaulish forms
> combine Aryaman with Ariomanus. They look (deceptively?) similar "on
> the surface" but their positions within their respective linguistic
> groups are rather different. Arya-mán- is a consonantal stem,
> apparently with the suffix *-me(:)n- (certainly _not_ IIr. *manu-
> s 'man'!), while Celtic *-ma:no-s is ... well, what is it anyway? Not
> anything that could easily be derived from *arjo-me:n, is it?
> Aryamán- corresponds to a common noun meaning "friend" and in generalWell, ariios is found in a Gaulish inscription where it appears to be a
> appears to be a personification of companionship, solidarity etc.
> *arjo-ma:nos (correct me if I'm wrong) has no really convincing
> etymology within Celtic, and _if_ related to <aire>, it doesn't quite
> correspond to <aryamán-> semantically.
> What about the following (EXTREMELY speculative) idea? The name orVery possible - and has already been suggested in an older article that I
> religious term *arjaman- (with some morphological and phonological
> adjustment) could be an element of Iranian (presumably Scythian)
> influence on early Celtic, together with the associated furrow-and-
> cow's-urine/milk ritual.