Re: [tied] More on the crummy sanguis/asrk connection

From: João Simões Lopes Filho
Message: 5098
Date: 2000-12-17

Or ve:na < *wegh-sna:-  ?
I've already ever doubts about the various developments of *gH in Latin...
gH- > Italic X- > h-
-gH- > Italic -gh- > -h- > zero
-igH- > -ig   cf. (ve-)stigium
-ngH, -rgH, -lgH > -ng, -rg, -lg
gHr- > gr- or r-?
-gHr- > ?
----- Original Message -----
From: Piotr Gasiorowski
To: cybalist@egroups.com
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2000 10:38 AM
Subject: Re: [tied] More on the crummy sanguis/asrk connection

Cf. ve:na 'vein, channel, watercourse' < *wegH-na:- from *weg^H- 'carry, convey'.
 
Piotr
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2000 3:54 AM
Subject: Re: [tied] More on the crummy sanguis/asrk connection

Until now I can't remember. When I wrote I was sure, but now I'm confuse.
Let's try...
akWno > akno
agWno > agno  cf. agnus
agWHno > agHno > *agno? *a:no?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: [tied] More on the crummy sanguis/asrk connection

Examples?
 
Piotr
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 9:30 PM
Subject: Re: [tied] More on the crummy sanguis/asrk connection

*regWHno- > *regno-, not *re:no.