Re: [tied] Re: Pre-Historical Matriarchy

Which particular historical dates would you disagree with, putting aside the
obvious ethnical anthagonism?
If you do not mind to give me just the pure academical facts, so I could
know the truth.
With respect,
Adriana K.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Piotr Gasiorowski" <gpiotr@...>
To: <cybalist@egroups.com>
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2000 7:43 PM
Subject: [tied] Re: Pre-Historical Matriarchy


>
> I absolutely agree. I am afraid this "independent expert" is just an
> ethnocentrically obsessed crank.
>
> Piotr
>
>
> --- In cybalist@egroups.com, celteuskara@... wrote:
> I bet everyone on this list who followed this link had a right
> laugh! Amazing how Mr. Ryabchikov has single handedly overturned
> centuries of foolish academia in his quest to prove that ProtoSlavs
> [for which we may as well read Great Russians] were identical with
> Skyths, Minoans, Etruscans, Pelasgians AND modern Cherkass. How come
> no one spotted such glaringly obvious facts before? Leave this man
> time and I am sure he will discover the Slavonic origins of
> agriculture, tool use, language and fire. What next? Christ
> actually born in a small village near Tver. Zarathustra a
> misspelling of Zdratastrov. Stonehenge and the Pyramids constructed
> by missionaries from Pskov while on their way to Great Zimbabwe.
> Roma as a contraction of the older name New Murom, founded by [et]
> Russkiys who can clearly be discerned as having inspired Homer to
> write all his poems.
>
>
> Beinn Mac an Gheairr
>
>
>
>
>