From: Danny Wier
Message: 2903
Date: 2000-07-31
> We are usually told that "everything began with the Greeks" - they[...]
> invented science, philosophy, architecture, mathematics, art, etc.
> I've even heard this at university. During my university studies (I
> studied the history of ideas) the influence on Greek philosophy and
> science from Egypt or other countries was hardly mentioned. But if
> most of the Greek words for these activities are borrowed, then the
> picture changes considerably. The Greeks must have been much more
> dependent on other cultures than what is widely known. Does anyone
> here know more about this - from whom did the Greeks borrow this?
> Could you give any specific examples of words and concepts being
> borrowed?
> Another place to get an idea of the storm this has created is "TheYeah, sadly the links were dead. But let me try some more. The gopher
> Afrocentric Debate" at http://www.jps.net/kabalen/afro.htm
> However this site doesn't seem to be working yet, the original
> address was : http://www.he.net/~skyeagle/afro.htm
> So, to briefly answer your question "from whom?" - the EgyptiansThis one I cannot accept. Egyptian (and Afro-Asiatic including
> and the Semitic-speaking Levantine cities.
> Some specific examples :
> 1. Toponyms
> Thebes Eg. d_b3t temple, shrine; d_b3
> wicker float; Sem. te:bah ark, chest
> Sparta/Sardis Eg. sp(3)(t) distrinct (nome) and itsThat one is possible, since according to what I've read about AA,
> capital
> Mycenae Sem. makHaneh camp, resting placeHmm... could go either way really...
> Larissa Eg. r-3Ht Entry to FertileEgyptian /r/ (and /n/) ~ Semitic /l/.
> Land
> 2. Divine, Semi-Divine and Legendary FiguresBear in mind that the ancient religions of Greecs and Rome are
> 3. Weaponry and Trade GoodsChariot and tackle from "net"?
> harma chariot and tackle Sem. Hrm net
> While members of this list may not agree with some or all of these,I agree with about 75% of these, personally. If there are borrowings,
> there are no accepted IE etymologies for any of these words (AFAIK),
> so I think there is a case here to be investigated more fully.
> Futhermore, this can be investigated as it is citing languages that
> are well known, rather than having recourse to unknown
> Asianic/Mediterranean languages.