From: Glen Gordon
Message: 2335
Date: 2000-05-04
> Here's more food for thought, Glen:Well, I was still feelin' hungry and went for a Big Mac. :)
> *pku- as the unstressed (zero-grade) composition form of *peku- isAlright... in Avestan and Sogdian. That's it?
> >DIRECTLY attested in Iranian,
>The pattern is the same as in *doru (gen. *drous) 'wood, tree'I've been starting to notice this weird genitive pattern too. It would be
> Compounds with *peku- (e.g. Sanskrit pa��u-pa: 'shepherd') seem toThe problem is that there's never any strongly attested cognate series with
> >contain an analogically restored *e. In the 'dog' word the early loss >of
>*p apparently severed the synchronic semantic connection between >*peku and
>*(p)kuo:n, splitting the etymon in two and preventing the >restoration of
>full-grade vocalism.
>
> The word-initial simplification of *pk to *k is evident in Greek
> >kteis/ktenos 'comb' (< *pkten-; cf. Latin pecto, pecten).