From: Sergejus Tarasovas
Message: 2001
Date: 2000-04-02
> On a side note, I'm rethinking your remarks on *pelh-. There is
> no *pelh- at
> all, is there? I only find attestations that show *pleh- in
> Greek, Latin and
> Sanskrit. Of course, that there this a Semitic root *m-l-? "to
> fill" may or
> may not have a bearing on my so-far lunatic theory. I'll try to structure
> this theory according to your input and get back to you.
>
> - gLeN