From: Gerry Reinhart-Waller
Message: 1419
Date: 2000-02-07
> The most rational solution is that it must have evolved slowly from a lessDon't laugh so loudly! You just might be correct. Linguistic
> abstract form - gestural language. Therefore, vocal language has bubbled
> forth in different populations in different areas independantly, giving rise
> to many Proto-Worlds over a vast period of time amongst a vocal but
> predominantly signing population. In this muddle, it would be quite
> impossible with comparative linguistics to work back to any early sign
> language form, nor to pick apart the intermediary but partially
> sign-dependant forms of vocal language from the gestural signs themselves.
>
> However, despite the certainty of polygenesis, we cannot pretend to know in
> our present knowledge whether the languages that have survived to the
> present day are or are not derived from some common ancestor (even though
> this is assuredly not THE Proto-World). Thus, it is still quite possible for
> a monogenetic origin of modern languages (a kind of "Eve hypothesis" in
> linguistic terms) but it is not possible for vocal language to have been
> anything other than polygenic.
>
> Soon everyone will be assimilated into Glen's World Order of Linguistic
> Theory.... HAHAHAHAHA!!!!
>
> - gLeN
>
>--
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Join eLerts to Save!
> Sign up for one or two today!
> http://click.egroups.com/1/1238/0/_/2431/_/949912269/
>
> -- Talk to your group with your own voice!
> -- http://www.egroups.com/VoiceChatPage?listName=cybalist&m=1