Re: [tied] Green

From: alex_lycos
Message: 18201
Date: 2003-01-27

Piotr Gasiorowski wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Patrick C. Ryan" <proto-language@...>
> To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 8:06 PM
> Subject: Re: [tied] Green

> The Latin form that closely corresponds to Germanic *wurtiz <
> *wr.h2d-i-s is <ra:dix> (<ra:di:c->) < *wr.h2d-ih2-. <ra:mus> is
> another related Latin word, but <viridis> _cannot_ belong here (or
> with *werdH-). It is a derivative of the verb <vireo:> 'green over,
> grow green', in which the /wir-/ part cannot derive either from
> *[wer] or from *[wr.]. It must contain an original *i, and the most
> likely connection is therefore with the root *weis- (Pokorny's
> 'sprout, grow'), with Balto-Slavic and Germanic cognates
>
> Piotr

some more cognates?

slavic: rod
greek: orthos
baltic: rasme ( which one from "baltic"?)
sanskrit: vardhati
iranian: vare:d

Piotr, I guess the "i" in latin is not original but it is an "e" . What
do you thing about?
Examples are more there. The OL /en/ >/in, /peer/>/pir/ and so on.