From: tgpedersen
Message: 16433
Date: 2002-10-19
> On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 22:12:38 -0000, "Richard Wordingham"another
> <richard.wordingham@...> wrote:
>
> >'Lope' is not the only Spanish name ending in '-e' when one would
> >expect '-o'. 'Felipe' (ultimately from Greek Philippos) is
> >example. Is it possible that the '-e' is actually a survival ofthe
> >vocative ending?onomastics
>
> Good idea. Alas, what little information I have on old Castilian
> (mainly an article "La apócope de la vocal en castellano antiguo",by Rafael
> Lapesa, 1951) tells a different story. It is well known that inOld Castilian
> documents final -e was apocopated in far more cases than in modernSpanish (e.g.
> prinçep, noch, cort, present, romanz). In some cases even -o wasdeleted,
> especially in proper names, and especially in the combination name+ patronymic.
> A form like Hernán (< Fernando) is a good example that hassurvived. This also
> solves the mistery of the /p/ in Lope. The name was Lobo,apocopated to Lob
> (e.g. an attested form Lob Diez). In final position, thedistinction between -b
> and -p was neutralized, and we have many attested cases of Lop inmedieval
> documents. When -e was restored (modern: príncipe, noche, corte,presente,
> romance), it was also restored on apocopated forms like Lop orFelip, giving
> Lope and Felipe.Might this have been a Castillian attempt to (re)assert the
>
> =======================
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> mcv@...