From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 16128
Date: 2002-10-10
----- Original Message -----From: Richard WordinghamSent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 12:45 PMSubject: Re: [tied] Underlying Circumflex in Greek--- In cybalist@......, "P&G" <petegray@......> wrote:
> >What is the evidence for the difference between acute and
circumflex
> >in Greek ever being anything other than a matter of where the
accent
> >is placed?
>
> If the last syllable is long and takes the accent, it may be acute
or
> circumflex. The circumflex is often (?always) the result of
contraction.
> Compare /tro:s/ acute = trojan, and /pho:s/ circumflex = light, the
latter
> from /phaos/.
Writing moraically, and with seven one mora vowels to avoid ambiguity
over ee and oo, the contrast is /trOÓs/ v. /pHÓOs/, a contrast of
placement of the pitch accent. (The letter omega derives from double
omicron.)
The cicumflex does not always arise from contraction. The sequence
of accented long plus short gets the circumflex (except in a few
contractions), thus /pHéuge/ 'flee!', compared to /épHeugon/ 'I was
fleeing'.
Richard.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.