Re: [tied] Re: Cimmerians

From: alexmoeller@...
Message: 14816
Date: 2002-08-30

----- Original Message -----
From: "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 1:41 PM
Subject: [tied] Re: Cimmerians


> > [Moeller] arent they the same Tauri which have had trouble
> > with Thracian King Boirebista?( and with them the Boii and
> > Scordiscii too?)
> > But if so, these tribes are supposed to have been celtic
> > tribes...
>
> Those were the Taurisci, but I think they are identical. The
times
> match. I think you'll like this site:
>
> http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/ee/msr/Ethno/ethno4.html
>
> Torsten

[Moeller] thank you Torsten. Soemthing interesting here too:
http://yurshilov.chat.ru/article1.html

A personal opinion: for one who seen Sarmizegetusa Regia is
astonishing the similarity from the big sanctuary of
Sarmizegetusa and this one from Cimmerian Kerson. Hmm, what
did I say before?The cimbri are not my thing? Of course not,
but the cimmerians for sure ,at least from now on.Specialy
when I see such toponims as Malorosso in a cimmerian region.
And Herodot said they should be thracians. And Malorosso means
nothing in Iranian?hmm.. In certain "romance" language it
does:-)
BTW, Maybe has Goerge some toponims more?:-))