Here, for the third time, in a "less aggressive" "orthography" for the second time, is the question:

What is your definition of "writing system," such that Blissymbolics is covered by it?
--
Peter T. Daniels grammatim@...


----- Original Message ----
From: Michael Everson <everson@...>
To: qalam@yahoogroups.com
Cc: Peter T. Daniels <grammatim@...>
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2006 7:28:28 PM
Subject: Re: FW: [M_L] Re: Languages with writing systems?


At 16:52 -0700 2006-10-14, Peter T. Daniels wrote:

>Rejecting my explanation of the all-caps most certainly is an insult.
>
>All I'm asking is some reason to suppose you might be right.

Peter, you need an attitude check. I am not your enemy. I am a
colleague who works very hard to ensure that the world's writing
systems can be used with the Universal Character Set. In the past I
have gone to some effort to respond to your criticisms of some
definitions in the Unicode Standard, including posting draft rewrites
of those definitions to this list. I get a lot of abuse from you,
though. I find your attitude of superiority to be irritating.

Having said that, while I will out of courtesy accept your
*explanation* of the ALL-CAPS, I will still not respond to it. If you
want it considered, you can send it again in a less aggressive
orthography. Should I reward you for being so relentlessly
ill-mannered?
--
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com