At 10:13 -0400 2006-10-11, Ph.D. wrote:

>We've been through this before. Neither of you is going to agree on
>the definition of "writing system" and neither of you is going to be
>convinced by the other.

I know what a writing system is, certainly. And I know a lot about
Blissymbolics. I don't see how anyone is going to convince me that it
isn't writing.

Definitions are not finite, and Blissymbolics is the exception that
proves the rule. This is elementary.
Michael Everson *