Re: "Push for simpler [English] spelling persists" - correction

--- In qalam@yahoogroups.com, "Richard Wordingham" <richard@...> wrote:

> > That's a non-sequitor.
>
> Non sequitur.

(Digression on foreign loanwords was incompletely suppressed. Some
writing systems do mangle them.)

> An extreme example is _blood_ v. _good_ v.
> _blood_.

_blood_ v. _good_ v. _food_

Richard.