>I said that because it took two weeks for a message to appear ... but
> On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 21:23:29 -0400, Peter T. Daniels
> <grammatim@...> wrote:
>
> > The list is, for all intensive purposes (that was a mondegreen, but here
> > it's apt), dead.
>
> Ahh.. Just dormant. I should go back and read some of the messages I had
> left, back then, for future reading. (^_^)