From: Peter T. Daniels
Message: 6409
Date: 2005-12-17
>No, if it had a motor, then it wasn't a handpress, and thus a lot less
> On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 11:14:49 -0500, Peter T. Daniels
> <grammatim@...> wrote:
>
> [nb]
> >> The press was one of the time-tested and honorable designs -- Round ink
> >> plate[n?] on top, spring-loaded ink rollers moving up and down on a pair
> [...]
>
> > It had a _MOTOR_???
>
> Gosh, maybe not! Possibly a treadle. I was about 12 y.o. then; I'll be 70,
> soon.