Nicholas Bodley wrote:

>*I've read of embedded fonts; presumably those are part of a given
>document.
>

Usually they are part of the document in the way a garage is a part of
the house. It is pretty separable and loosely attached.

>Only some are designated to be
>embeddable; doing so with others violates copyright, I think.
>
>

Sounds like fair use to me, which is an affirmative defense against
copyright claims. Now, whether or not a font is *licensed* for a
particular use may matter, and may be germane in a specific case. That
is not a copyright issue at all. But IANAL so YMMV.

>Maybe it's worth mentioning that the only sure way (practical way, afaik)
>to show others what you see on your screen is to "take a screen shot" and
>provide the resulting image; that's no longer a text file.
>
>

Also worth mentioning that if you do that and store it as a jpg image,
you are using a lossy compression. that might not matter in Suzanne's
case in point, but in other situations it might, so I note it here.

>Corrections welcome!
>
>

Best,

Barry