From: suzmccarth
Message: 6275
Date: 2005-10-13
>for
> suzmccarth wrote:
>
> > I have been reading research on literacy in Canadian syllabics
> > years, and more recently the effects on literacy of Phags-pa, andthe
> > Hangul as well as Syllabics. All of them use orientation to some
> > extent. This does not impede literacy, on the contrary the
> > organization of alphabetic units into syllables is common to all
> > these scripts as well, and has had a more significant effect in
> > opposite direction.would
> >
> > For Syllabics, Phags-pa and Hangul there was a well-recognized
> > positive effect on literacy. Unfortunately no one has yet found a
> > suitable way to write English in syllables to test whether it
> > have a positive effect on literacy in North America. However,there
> > are always researchers who suspect that this would be the case.Cyrillic
>
> Hunh? Phags-pa was in use for less than a century (1269-1368 at the
> most), and evidence for it is meager. Mongolia tried reintroducing
> Mongolian script in 1989 or 91 or so, but it had been pretty well
> extirpated by Cyrillic, and they've apparently gone back to
> now; could you be referring to the Mongolian revival?I would hardly think of Mongolian (Uighur) as having any of the