On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 00:26:44 -0400, Mark E. Shoulson <mark@...> wrote:

> Nicholas Bodley wrote:

Sorry, but somewhere, somehow the quoting logic "broke"; I didn't write
anything in the message you posted. It almost looks as though you're
crediting me with what you wrote! It's rather amusing.

>> On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 21:26:47 -0400, Don Osborn <dzo@...> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> but the resulting similarity of everything meant you
>>> had to pay very rapt attention to each form in order to read text in
>>> it (or so it seemed to me; this was not like Chinese characters which
>>> have many unique forms and resulting combinations, but rather used
>>> positioning and number of dots and straight lines to make the
>>> distinctions, as I recall).
>>>
>>>
> That was what I thought when I followed the link earlier this evening to
> that "Norquay Script." It's mostly Tengwar. Now Tengwar is a very
> pretty alphabet, and an intelligently-designed one... but as an actual

etc.

Regards,


--
Nicholas Bodley /*|*\ Waltham, Mass. (Not "MA")
The curious hermit -- autodidact and polymath
Opera: No more banner ads in its free version.