Michael wrote:

> >(a) When was that posting? Why have you never alluded to it before?
> I don't remember, and I don't have time to dig in the archives right

On 16 September 2005 9.32 PM you claimed Blisssymbolic was a writing system.

On 17 September 9.52 PM you complain that Colmas' definition is incomplete.

On 18 September 2005 5.25 PM you talk about submitting definitions to
a committee.

On 29 September 2005 4.53 PM you ask if Suzie is interested in
improving the definition.

On 4 October 2005 5.37 PM you claim you have provided the definition
that Peter is requesting.

On 14 August 2005 9.34 PM you complain about Peter's definition of
Boustrophedon.

Those are the only times you have used the word "definition" when you
are not quoting somebody, since Feb 2005.

On 7 August 2005 3.15 PM, 3.41 PM, and 4.50 PM, you wrote a message
with a subject line "Moraic Writing Systems"

On 2 Sept 2005 4.18 PM, you talk about Vai syllables as a writing system.

On 2 Sept 2005 8.25 PM, you claim that the Latin writing system is the
universal writing system of the planet.

Those are the only times you have used the phrase "writing system"
when you are not quoting somebody, since Feb 2005, in a thread other
than this one.

So just where did you post your mythical definition of writing system?

> Have you ever met a non-speaking person?

Yes.

xan

jonathon
--
Does your Office Suite conform to ISO Standards?