Re: Number of writing systems

>> suzmccarth wrote:
>>> . . . . However, isn't a writing system featural only
>>> if the basic set of units are featural. I can't think
>>> of any that actually are. . . .

> "Peter T. Daniels" wrote:
>> In chronological order: Hangul. Pitman. Visible Speech. Gregg.

suzmccarth wrote:

> And Shavian?

and tengwar?

--
Anton Sherwood, http://www.ogre.nu/
"How'd ya like to climb this high *without* no mountain?" --Porky Pine