From: suzmccarth
Message: 6081
Date: 2005-09-24
> You cannot make Blissymbolics into a writing system by arguing thatit's
> a language.Maybe a simpler definition of writing system is needed. What do you
>
> It may indeed be a language, a language with exclusively visual form,
> but by that very fact it _is not_ a writing system.
>
> Unless you use a definition of "writing system" that's different from
> any definition that's ever appeared in the literature.
>
> That's why I keep asking what you mean by "writing system."