At 03:43 +0000 2005-09-22, suzmccarth wrote:

>Michael, I seem to be having some difficultiy tracking the latest
>version of Unicode. I just read version 4.0 but it lumps together in
>Table 6-1 Ethiopic, Canadian Aboriginal Syllabics and Hangul
>as 'Featural Syllabaries' - is that intended to stand?

If you object and have alternate text to propose, state your
objection and propose alternate text.

>And is there some reason why for CAS, 'the relationship of sound and
>graphic parts is less systematic' than for Hangul?

If you have a point to make, make it.

>I'm sorry but I seem to get mixed up between version 4.0, 4.0.1 and
>version 4.1.0. The links seem to go round and round.

I don't know what links you are talking about. Be specific. Address
your queries about Unicode itself to the unicode@... list.
--
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com