Michael Everson wrote:
> At 16:57 -0400 2005-09-17, Peter T. Daniels wrote:
> >All I have to go on is the evidence posted here. You don't use
> >long-established linguistic terminology the way linguists do.
> I am a linguist, Peter. I am a polyglot, an Indo-Europeanist, and an
> expert in the world's writing systems.
> >Each of the words in the previous posting(s) on whose interpretation you
> >differed.
> Be specific. Which words did I use, how did I define them, and how
> did that differ from the way other linguists use such words?

I don't have time to play your game.

Look at the words where I asked for your interpretation.

Plus, of course, the "abjad/abugida" fiasco at the Unicode glossary.
Peter T. Daniels grammatim@...