From: Michael Everson
Message: 5779
Date: 2005-09-02
>First, most of us, including Marco, have agreed that segmenting theI maintain that there is some built-in segmentation petterns in the
>syllable is an acquired skill not related to intelligence.
>Second, some of us also agree that there are pragamatic reasonsIt is hard to see another scenario.
>(i.e. accessibility) why Vai who are not literate in English will
>not be using a computer.
>On the latter point, on the more practical level, a roman keyboardYes, even if they can read the Qur'an, the vocabulary used is
>is going to be used more in any case. (Scribner and Cole make it
>clear that Arabic is a single domain literacy, therefore not
>practical for computer use.)
>However, Scribner and Cole also state that most Vai iterates are notAnd isn't, therefore, using a computer.
>literate in English. So the *typical* Vai literate is not literate
>in English.
>And there is a certain consensus, outside of your personalIf you have one, it doesn't take decades to learn the other.
>conviction, that alphabetic literacy is a different skill than
>syllabic literacy.
>I spend most of my time beside children teaching reading and comuterThat still doesn't mean it would take an inordinate amount of time
>skills. I can guarantee you that dealing with basic computer
>navigation does *not* require being able to segment the syllable.
>Practically speaking your roman keyboard is a must and certainly aGet out a sheet of paper and start figuring out where to put the
>necessity for any biliterate Vai, who would most likely have learned
>literacy in English first. But ideally, there should be a keyboard
>for a typical Vai literate developed eventually.