Peter T. Daniels wrote:

> i18n@... wrote:
> >
> > Peter T. Daniels wrote:
> >
> > > I guess "crowning achievement" has some special meaning for you.
> >
> > Pretty much the same thing you would find in any place that offers
> > definitions.
> >
> > What does it mean to you?
>
> It should have been clear that to me it means something other than a
> rehash of a ten-year-old project.

It should have been clear to me that you wouldn't be able to understand
what I was suggesting. Maybe you have forgotten you wrote :

> That would be nice indeed

In response to my original suggestion, which, to save you the trouble of
searching was:

> it might still find a broader audience among
> O'Reilly's fiercely devoted readers, which would be another benefit

to you.

I think you are just being contrary to be contrary, forgetting that you
liked the original idea, and instead nitpicking on figure of speeches
just because you can.

Oh well, you can have the last word because I won't be addressing it
again. I see you have much better things going on right now - I wish you
good luck with that!

Best,

Barry