From: Michael Everson
Message: 5639
Date: 2005-08-31
>Saying that some people use these keyboards doesn't mean that most can.It's the Ethiopian standard method of input. Are you saying that
>Everyone only sees a small portion of reality. That is why we readYes, but the research simply said who reads Vai, who reads Latin, who
>other people's research.
>The point is that reading a syllabic script can be learned outsideOrthogonal to the question of
>of school without learning alphabetic literacy.
>Now that these syllabic systems require alphabetic literacy forNot at all. The writing system is what it is. If you had
>computer input, the nature of that writing system, on the computer,
>at any rate,
>will shift significantly.
>Vai literates will have to go to school to learn how to input inSo? If they don't need to use computers, it doesn't matter. And if
>Vai. Traditional Vai literates will not likely have this
>opportunity.
>If we accept that computers will only be accessible for those whoAbsent an operating system and application software localized into
>read the English alphabet that is one thing. I understand that that
>is your position, and maybe it is realistic.
> > The brief is 340 characters.Neither is the shift key, but you learned that. My point is that if
>>
> > QWERTY deadkeys solves the problem smashingly.
>
>Deadkeys are hardly intuitive either.
>The point is that Vai literates do not differentiate these phonemesThat's a matter of learning to spell. Vai manuals for children, now,
>when writing with a pencil.
>English is an official langauge of India and 10% are literate in English.And anyone who drives in India knows how to read street signs.
>I do know about the Ethiopic keyboard. However, Ethiopic is aI disagree.
>very regular alphasyllabary/abugida, not really comparable with
>Vai.