From: suzmccarth
Message: 5618
Date: 2005-08-30
>Bugger theI always had the impresssion that you put great stock in
> research.
>The facts are that some people (lots of them) who use aThere are *lots* of Chinese who use Pinyin input, lots and lots.
> syllabic script are able to type using alphabetic input.
> Well, Suzanne, I have challenged you or anyone else to offerdesign
> principles for a non-alphabetic Vai keyboard.You must be aware that we are still gathering information on
>a for
> What does this mean with regard to teaching people to type t +
> ta and t + i for ti?I would expect the problem to come when trying to differentiate
>It is impossible to imagine that a Vai using aGiven the distribution of electricity and the distribution of Vai
> computer will not know the Latin script.
>It is certainly impossiblesuch
> to imagine that a Vai will get very far using a computer without
> knowledge.Children can do some amazing things without being able to
>Liberia has,
> Assuming access to the basic alphabet (which EVERYONE in
> insofar as the road signs are written in Latin script),You offer the 'roadsign literacy hypothesis' as a counter
> outrageous to suggest that Vai people, who are as smart asanyone
> else, can be tought to type t + a for ta and t + i for ti.After reading Weiben's post I am surprised that you think we are
> --
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com