Re: Generalizations about English spelling --> voiceless "w"

From: Nicholas Bodley
Message: 5207
Date: 2005-08-01

On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:18:54 -0400, Peter T. Daniels
<grammatim@...> wrote:

> voiceless w

I know it's quite basic, but I assume "voiceless" is similar to, or
identical with, unvoiced? However, I find it quite difficult to imagine a
voiceless w. Would welcome some help, here, although it's going OT,
perhaps.

--
Nicholas Bodley /*|*\ Waltham, Mass. (Not "MA")
The curious hermit -- autodidact and polymath
Hope for these times: Paul Rogat Loeb's book --
"The Impossible Will Take a Little While:..."

Previous in thread: 5193
Next in thread: 5208
Previous message: 5206
Next message: 5208

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts