Deliberate Non-Phonemicity (was: C.A.S. ref.)

From: Richard Wordingham
Message: 5057
Date: 2005-05-06

--- In qalam@yahoogroups.com, "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@...> wrote:

> Considering that no orthography has ever deliberately been
> "non-phonemic," that looks like a pretty good guess.

Some of the Roman alphabet-based 'syllabaries', e.g. that of
Potawatomi, deliberately drop the phonation contrast! Or are you
denying these systems the status of 'orthographies'?

Philippine orthographies relegate glottal stops to the pronunciations
shown in dictionaries. Malay <e> (two distinct vowels) and final <k>
also spring to mind, though <k> may be an example of a language having
two co-existing spelling systems - native and loanword.

As to the Royal Thai General System of Transcription,...

Richard.

Previous in thread: 5056
Next in thread: 5059
Previous message: 5056
Next message: 5058

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts