From: Mark E. Shoulson
Message: 4752
Date: 2005-04-18
>Richard Wordingham wrote:Two different matters being discussed here. Richard Wordingham is
>
>
>>There's no reason to believe ayin had been lost before the text was pointed.
>>Many of the minor peculiarites of the lamedh guttural verbs may however be
>>late, as the taw of the endings is dagesh (plosive) rather than raphe
>>(fricative) despite the pathah between the guttural and the taw.
>>Unfortunately for me, I don;t think there's any reason to believe it was a
>>glottal stop.
>>
>>
>
>"Furtive patach" is a late, Masoretic invention. (So is the
>fricativization, carried over from Aramaic.)
>