From: Andrew Dunbar
Message: 4530
Date: 2005-03-26
>No. He's just misusing the terminology again. He means
> --- In qalam@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Constable"
> <petercon@...> wrote:
> > > From: Peter T. Daniels [mailto:grammatim@...]
> >
> > > Standard Mac fonts don't _have_ edh or thorn.
> >
> > I find that difficult to believe, though not
> > having a Mac in front of me at the moment I can't
> > prove otherwise.
> >
> >
> > > Icelandic isn't one of the many languages
> > > they're designed to accommodate.
> > > Hungarian is, but I gather standard Windows
> > > fonts don't have the long-umlaut diacritic.
> >
> > Well, I know what an umlaut diacritic is, but
> > don't know how that differs from a "long-umlaut
> > diacritic". If you could point me to a sample of
> > one, I'd be interested to find out.
>
> Well, having had a look at the Microsoft Sans Serif
> font, he clearly doesn't mean double acute accent
> (U+030B), double vertical line above (U+030E) or
> double grave accent (U+030F), unless he does not
> reckon combining forms (which these are) as being
> diacritics. It's also got precomposed o double
> acute and u double acute (near U+0150, in Latin
> Extended-A in the Unicode scheme). Trebuchet MS
> (admittedly meant to be a flagship script, according
> to its embedded blurb) and Arial also have these
> precomposed letters. However, while they have the
> spacing form of double acute (U+02DD), they don't
> have the combining form.
> Perhaps that's what he means.
> Richard.http://en.wiktionary.org -- http://linguaphile.sf.net/cgi-bin/translator.pl
>
>
>
>