From: suzmccarth
Message: 4272
Date: 2005-02-26
> suzmccarth wrote:child abuse,
> >
> > --- In qalam@yahoogroups.com, "Peter T. Daniels"
> > <grammatim@...> wrote:
> >
> > > Do you have any idea what this is about?
> > >
> > > English is no deaf person's native language.
> > >
> > > If you take away their native language, you are engaging in
> > > and if the Canadian authorities do not realize this, then theyare far
> > > more incompetent that the US education departments.What research are you drawing on here? I have asked you repeatedly
> >
> > There are some excellent oral language programs in US. and
> > many government funded ASL programs here. It is a personal
> > decision in both countries. Please do not speculate.
> >
> > I believe that any further discussion about language choice for
> > he deaf and hard of hearing is OT.
> >
> > I only wanted to say that without learning the oral language,
> > literacy is not likely to progress beyond grade 3. If you are
>aware
> > of statistics which counter this, they would be most welcome.
>
> If the children have no native language to start with, they are
>unlikely
> to learn "English" at all anyway.
> Again: Why do you suppose "dummy" is a term of abuse?Because people like you use the term in this way.