From: Peter T. Daniels
Message: 3939
Date: 2005-01-15
>I only tried "overstrike" and got 0 true returns.
> > From: Peter T. Daniels [mailto:grammatim@...]
>
> > Where did you find it in the so-called "Help" system?
>
> I was able to find it by searching for "equations" (15 false returns), "equations overstrike" (8 false returns) or "overstrike" (0 false returns).
> > Nor does it appearThe subsystem it's part of is not considered a priority either by MS or
> > in at least two of those giant aftermarket manuals the computer
> > publishers put out.
>
> And so?
> > > done using \o() in an "Eq" (equation) field. For instance, I've enteredNo, because simply typing that string of characters (even if that's
> > the following text element into my Rich Text message (not sure how this
> > will show up in your mail client) using the field code {eq \o(a,/)}.
> >
> > Something like that.
>
> *That*, not something like that.
> > > If you want to enter a Latin character with a dot below, such as (say) dWord2001 appears to the user identical to Word2000 (and the books about
> > with underdot, the best thing to do is to enter the appropriate Unicode
> > character sequence in Word 2003 and display it with an appropriate
> > OpenType font, such as Doulos SIL: dò
> >
> > That doesn't work in Word2001.
>
> If you want to work with transliterations or a variety of the world's writing systems, and would like it to work in a useful variety of apps, you should be using Windows.
> > > Subscripts and superscripts are implemented in word processors inMicrosoft removed the ability to nest (in this case) vertical
> > various ways...
>
> > > Such approaches do not provide true typographic super-/subscripts. Look
> > for true typographic super-/subscripts implemented using OpenType in apps
> > like Adobe InDesign or in future versions of Word.
> >
> > I.e., they removed functionality.
>
> ?? Who removed what functionality?