From: Patrick Chew
Message: 3367
Date: 2004-08-05
>"suzmccarth" <suzmccarth@...> wrote:Do you mean in the last line "<k> + <vowel sign au>"?
> > How about o + k + u = k + ou ?
> > This would then display properly as o + k + u. Is this possible?
>
>I don't see this combination on the Tamil unicode page. Do you mean
>
>visual <vowel sign e> + <k> + <aa> => stored <k> + <o>, equivalent to
>stored <k> + <vowel sign e> + <aa>?
>In Thai, visual and stored <sara e> + <k> + <sara aa> isUnfortunately, this depends on which set of Indic scripts you
>pronounced /kau/ and seems to correspond historically. Other
>possibly relevant groups are
><sara e> + <k> + <mai han-akat> = /ke?/It's not actualy <mai han-akat>, but <sara a> that combines with
><sara ae> + <k> + <mai han-akat> = /kE?/ (low-mid front vowel, transcribed
><ae>)
><sara e> + <k> + <ii> + <y> = /kia/For the diphthongs, there is no large issue, excepting for sorting
><sara e> + <k> + <uee> + <character o ang> = /kMa/ (first vocalic element
>is high back unrounded vowel)
><sara e> + <k> + <character o ang> = /k7:/ (close-mid back unrounded vowel)
><character o ang> is a glottal stop, but it also serves (mater lectionisurm.. wouldn't <character o ang> just be a conflation of two
>in an abugida?) for the open-low back rounded vowel (/O/).