Re: Abjad: definition

From: John Cowan
Message: 3336
Date: 2004-08-02

Peter T. Daniels scripsit:

> It seems clear to me that for Unicode's purposes this is also a useless
> dichotomy. They might find that the break between 8-bit and 16-bit
> characters is important, for instance.

There is no such division in Unicode. Characters can be represented:

in 32 bits, always;
or some in 16 bits, others in 32 bits;
or some in 8 bits, some in 16 bits, some in 24 bits, and some in 32 bits.

The concept "8-bit character" even less sense than "alphabetic document".

--
Barry gules and argent of seven and six, John Cowan
on a canton azure fifty molets of the second. jcowan@...
--blazoning the U.S. flag http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

Previous in thread: 3334
Next in thread: 3338
Previous message: 3335
Next message: 3337

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts