Re: How about a typology for input methods

Michael Everson wrote:

>
> At 19:14 -0400 2004-07-16, Peter T. Daniels wrote:
>
> > > Alas, I now realize that I am not familiar with any script that is
> >> really a candidate for any typology. Hebrew, Arabic, Tamil, Korean,
> >> Cree. All are in some way UNUSUAL.
> >
> >Did you start out as an English major?
>
> Peter. Please try to realize that everyone on this list is a real
> live person, and that going out of your way to insult them is really
> rather puerile. And you seem to be going out of your way to insult
> people on this list. That makes you look rather puerile. It gets in
> the way of any of us actually appreciating the knowledge you bring to
> this forum.
>
> If you don't think that what you have written above is dismissive and
> insulting, do try to think again.

Michael: you made it your business to be nothing but insulting for
several days at the beginning of this week. When I then posted the
material that you claimed to be unable to locate yourself, which
demonstrated that my assertions were completely correct, you fell
totally silent. You now reemerge to do nothing but complain once again.

I, however, answer every one of Suzanne's questions, and she answers
very few of mine; and she continues to manifest that she does not
understand the answers, and continues to inject questions that have no
evident connection with the material to which she appends them.

This is, to say the least, frustrating. I am expressing frustration.
--
Peter T. Daniels grammatim@...