Re: How about a typology for input methods

From: Peter Constable
Message: 3074
Date: 2004-07-13

> From: suzmccarth [mailto:suzmccarth@...]


> > My hypothesis regarding this has been that spelling has (in this
> > respect) remained stable while pronunciation has not. So, the vowel
> gets
> > dropped, but the spelling isn't changed to reflect it.
>
> Yes, of course, but is it possible that the stress patterns, among
> other things, have caused pronunciation to change? Wouldn't some
> unstressed vowels disappear over time but remain in the spelling?
> What about "achever" in French?

Of course. I was differentiating, however, between a diachronic cause
versus a synchronic context. I suspect that no teacher in India has
taught their students that halant / pulli is optional on unstressed
inherent vowels.


Peter Constable

Previous in thread: 3072
Next in thread: 3075
Previous message: 3073
Next message: 3075

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts