Re: Unicode definitions of script types

Peter T. Daniels wrote:

>"Unicode Standard," whoever that is, screwed with the definitions they
>found in my book (or, possibly, prior articles). Why should I try to get
>them to unscrew with what was plainly before their eyes?
>
>

Why, for the same reason you're correcting them here: because it bothers
you to see inaccurate information disseminated. It bothers you enough
to correct it here, why not correct it where it can make a difference
and reach more people? And if it doesn't bother you, why are you
correcting it here?

~mark