Peter T. Daniels wrote:

>Michael Everson wrote:
>
>
>>At 08:22 -0400 2004-07-11, Peter T. Daniels wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Then you should be chastising Unicode, not the deviser of the
>>>terminology, since the terminology seems to have been taken over
>>>without understanding and inaccurately.
>>>
>>>
>>If you have an issue with the definitions in the Unicode Standard,
>>please be specific about each of them.
>>
>>
>
>How would I know what they are? Perhaps the definitions are perfectly
>accurate. All I see is quotations showing the terms being misused.
>
>

Then perhaps, instead of repeatedly chastising everyone who asks a
question to read all of your works, you should read the works you're
commenting on before questioning them.

~mark