From: Michael Everson
Message: 2946
Date: 2004-07-11
>Then you should be chastising Unicode, not the deviser of theIf you have an issue with the definitions in the Unicode Standard,
>terminology, since the terminology seems to have been taken over
>without understanding and inaccurately.
>How is this different from Ethiopic (except in how Unicode foolishlyThis is ridiculous and offensive. There is nothing "foolish" in the
>chose to present their chart)?