Marco wrote:

> not to mention the 70,000+ Chinese "characters"
> which could have been avoided with a "composing
> radicals" approach).

A Chinese character is written as <radical>+<something
else>
The number of <radical>'s is a limited set (214), but
the number of <something else>'s is not. What you are
envisioning would be either (a) impossible to
implement or (b) far too complex to use by end-users
(how many Chinese use CangJie?)








Yahoo! Mail : votre e-mail personnel et gratuit qui vous suit partout !
Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.benefits.yahoo.com/

Dialoguez en direct avec vos amis grâce à Yahoo! Messenger !Téléchargez Yahoo! Messenger sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com