Nicholas Bodley wrote:

> [As to politics, (and perhaps best-forgotten history?), iirc Tibetan was
> deleted (and later re-included), but I might well misunderstand the
> reasons; maybe it was *not* pressure from the P.R.C.?]

It was not. There were structural problems in the earlier Tibetan encoding, so it was
replaced.

John Hudson

--

Tiro Typeworks www.tiro.com
Vancouver, BC tiro@...

Currently reading:
Typespaces, by Peter Burnhill
White Mughals, by William Dalrymple
Hebrew manuscripts of the Middle Ages, by Colette Sirat