Nicholas Bodley scripsit:

> On Mon, 24 May 2004 12:13:13 +0200, Marco Cimarosti
> <marco.cimarosti@...> wrote:
>
> > The most common conventions are SAMPA and Kirshenbaum's:
> >
> > http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/sampa/home.htm
> > http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Evan_Kirshenbaum/IPA/faq.html
>
> Many thanks!

Note that SAMPA is semi-official but doesn't provide
a complete encoding of IPA. X-SAMPA by John Wells
(http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/sampa/x-sampa.htm) and
its close variant CXS (http://www.theiling.de/ipa/) do.
You can find an IPA chart with X-SAMPA annotations (in blue) at
http://conlang.eusebeia.dyndns.org/ipa/xsamchart.png and a CXS analogue at
http://conlang.eusebeia.dyndns.org/ipa/cxschart.png . The differences are
fairly trivial, mostly a matter of adopting a few Kirshenbaum conventions.
Both are upward compatible with SAMPA. I would recommend using either of
these rather than Kirshenbaum.

--
Is a chair finely made tragic or comic? Is the John Cowan
portrait of Mona Lisa good if I desire to see jcowan@...
it? Is the bust of Sir Philip Crampton lyrical, www.ccil.org/~cowan
epical or dramatic? If a man hacking in fury www.reutershealth.com
at a block of wood make there an image of a cow,
is that image a work of art? If not, why not? --Stephen Dedalus